WAR (Warhammer Online)

---

Originally posted by baso80

---

Originally posted by Kilmar

When I want a game with wow graphics, I play on my old Amiga =(

---

Yes you do that. The MINORITY of players would agree with you.

The rest play what they think is fun out there. WoW, if anything, has proved that.

---

Uh, I'm sorry but we don't need crappy graphics engines just to play MMOs.

WoW's engine is great to run on anything but it's also 3 years old and looks like crap. The problem with funcom is they are terrible at creating a engine that can perform on ANY machine, not just top end machines. They proved this with AO and are showing us they didn't learn a thing with AoC.

DAoC ran fine on most PCs of the day and looked decent. I suspect WAR will do the same... but it certainly doesn't look like the junk of 3-4 years ago.

Originally posted by Tonev

 

Originally posted by elvenangel

god another lame aoc thread by a poster i've never even seen in the WAR forums before...*sigh* ... this is becoming annoying now its enough ... if the aoc suxxor threads dont' stop coming here ... drawing the poor harried aoc fans out from their own forum to cause trouble...i'm going to seriously consider stop coming to mmorpg.com     Its like the moment a game has something bad happen people flip out and go to the supposed 'competitions' forum and start all these BS pointless threads...lets talk about WAR...this is the WAR forum after all.

Elven, no one is forcing you to read his/her posts (I hope), and if you see it as a problem thread send a moderator or admin a pm "it's not that difficult". His thread is clear, concise, and true of what I have read and noticed with people in the AoC community as well.

 

On a note as I have said many, many times on this forum if you expect to run Warhammer or AoC on a 5 year old WOW rig without upgrading anything, expect to have low performance and a lot of issues. A lot of people do not realize that upgrading is a necessary evil in the gaming industry, and if not done on occasions (don't have to do it every year) will bog down your performance big time in any game.

It bleeds into every thread here otherwise I wouldnt' get pissed off.  Reporting does absolutely no good.

One of those classic catch 22 scenario's...

Build the game to really look and feel next gen OR build it to be playable by the masses.  It's often difficult to do both.  In either case, gameplay or content shouldn't be sacrificed for 'cowbell'.

Some people will simply not be able to play new games.  A system that is 4-5 years old should be upgraded (either at a component level OR an entire system upgrade).  If that's not possible, then hopefully they can try to make adjustments to game settings to at least make it playable.  But they shouldn't expect to be able to really 'crank it up'.

A system that is less than 4-5 months old should be able to run any game.  Obviously there are a great deal of variables to be considered from system to system, but a current (newish) system shouldn't choke or sputter on an MMO...ever.

Originally posted by elvenangel

god another lame aoc thread by a poster i've never even seen in the WAR forums before...*sigh* ... this is becoming annoying now its enough ... if the aoc suxxor threads dont' stop coming here ... drawing the poor harried aoc fans out from their own forum to cause trouble...i'm going to seriously consider stop coming to mmorpg.com     Its like the moment a game has something bad happen people flip out and go to the supposed 'competitions' forum and start all these BS pointless threads...lets talk about WAR...this is the WAR forum after all.

B. While I do not tend to write often, I am a daily reader of this forum. I don't see the relevancy of me being a "new" face on the block.

C. I didn't claim AoC is the "suxxor". I merely pointed out some things that I hope and believe EA Mythic will learn and implement.

Don't stop coming to mmorpg.com just because of me. I kinda like the doom cat.

Can i know what's the specs of your computer UrbanMonkey? and if you are following this games since 2 years ago, you should know that they are more demanding in terms of Hardware. Couldn't you had save some money in those 2 years time to buy a new Rig? Cpu+Graphics+Mem+mobo  is quite cheap nowdays.. with 500 euros you can get something nice (excluding monitor).

Set your graphics to low and you will be fine.

<modedit>

Originally posted by PaRoXiTiC

Set your graphics to low and you will be fine.

<modedit>

Whats the point of releasing a game where 80% of the players have to lower their graphics to LOW.

It's Vanguard all friggin over again! I really wonder where some people have been for the last couple of years, spouting the same crap over and over learning nothing from what happened.

You call that guy pathetic and suggest he turns his settings to low, maybe he doesnt want to play a game where you have to turn it down to EQ1 level of graphics just to play the damn thing??

This will cause people to leave the game in droves, many people are buying the game thinking their going to play the game with the same look as the videos - they should know better but they don't - this alone will mean a huge disappointment to people.

Again Funcom has NOT learned the lessons of vanguard both on its level of graphics and its buggy release.  AoC is such a disaster waiting to happen its ridiculous.

<modedit>

Originally posted by Vortigon

 

Originally posted by PaRoXiTiC

Set your graphics to low and you will be fine.

<modedit>

Whats the point of releasing a game where 80% of the players have to lower their graphics to LOW.

It's Vanguard all friggin over again! I really wonder where some people have been for the last couple of years, spouting the same crap over and over learning nothing from what happened.

You call that guy pathetic and suggest he turns his settings to low, maybe he doesnt want to play a game where you have to turn it down to EQ1 level of graphics just to play the damn thing??

This will cause people to leave the game in droves, many people are buying the game thinking their going to play the game with the same look as the videos - they should know better but they don't - this alone will mean a huge disappointment to people.

Again Funcom has NOT learned the lessons of vanguard both on its level of graphics and its buggy release.  This game is such a disaster waiting to happen its ridiculous.

<modedit>

Nah there's plenty of people willing to follow the Boob n Gore master into the fiery pits of failure, if that is indeed what happens. PaRoXiTiC is probably a 14 year old who would gladly do said action. I agree with the OP, but there's ALOT of people who ignore it and just want to play because it feels so new and good. Good for them, I want more than one big kid on the block. AoC = 200k subs, WAR = 400k or more (over time for both of course).

Originally posted by Mooon

 

Originally posted by Teala

Originally posted by urbanmonkey

Well, actually it proved several things:

1. 2008 video cards are just not powerful enough to run and MMO using "realistic" graphics engine. At least not in an MMO. I mean look at the 88800 Ultra. A card released 18 months ago and still nothing can beat it. I remember times where you bought the best card only for it to be crap a year later. Sure Crysis looks great at full settings but only 0.1% of PC gamers have a rig that can run that decently (read MAX settings in DX10). And Crytek only had to deal with the engine and AI. No quests, no balancing, no crowded areas. In short, do the decent thing and stick to cartoony graphics as in WAR, LOTRO and WOW.

2. The best part in an MMO is the fact that you feel like you are a character in a parallel world. A seamless world just waiting for you to discover it. So what is the last thing you need in it? Loading screens. That is your greatest enemy. And AoC is basically a loading screen experience spiced up with some gameplay. I kid you not. That is why with all its shitty graphics people still play WOW. You can take a horse and run from Booty Bay to the Eastern Plaguelands without ever seeing a single loading screen. Try that in AoC.

3. Releasing a game that requires a high end computer to run at medium settings goes against the whole point of an MMO (FYI the first M stands for Massive). Anyone with a computer older than 2 years will not be able to play this game at all. Sure some people run dual 8800 GTS in SLI mode, but even them don't run the game very smoothly. These problems can be reduced after release, but a crappy game engine is a crappy game engine.

If WOW can avoid the loading screen plague and have the game running on average machines, it will have a decent shot at success. If the gameplay and combat are good of course :)

I almost wish AoC was done in the art style of WoW, but with the flare of a Savage Sword of Conan graphic novel.  That way it could be seamless like WoW and probably run way smoother than it does now.  

These graphics maybe cartoony, but these graphics don't drag a computer to its knees.

This is why WAR has beaten AOC now. WAR has everything and more to offer in the PVP/RVR stakes than AOC including an open rvr server just like AOC ffa server but most of all it has graphics like this... Be quick because this vid wont be on these forums long ...

 

This is the winning formula of the day..Mexican standoff..lol

www.dailymotion.com/error1987/video/8872555

3mins / 4mins 10 secs. looks like invisible walls on those maps. pretty linear and the video wasnt that impressive to be honest... everyone looks the same