| Thread (42 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Illyrian 4/25/08 3:42:09 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/02/08 |
Originally posted by Druz
I don't think you have a case - Forochel si level 44 to 50 area. You are level 50, until Moria expansion there is no leveling up. Once expansion is out you will hit the ceiling and be at the exactly the same spot as you are now. LOTRO is a quest based traditional MMO - end game means you have to find your own fun. For me that is raiding, crafting, exploring, RPing, wrapping up quests for fun. Even if there is absolutely no rep in Forochel you would be equally bored. What do envision would be a better idea for bored level 50 to play in the area a bit under its level of difficulty? |
|
| |
||
|
WSIMike 4/25/08 3:44:46 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 3/09/04
"This Space For Rent" |
Originally posted by Druz
Is that more correct? If that's the case then... eek.. yeah... kind of a rough call.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Illyrian 4/25/08 3:49:33 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/02/08 |
Slight variation, WSIMike, player level does not affect amount of rep gathered from a quest. Quests are enough to climb up the ladder to get basic perks and a bit more but not to fillt he rep bar all the way tot he top. I think it is just as well or everyone who wrapped up the quests in the region would top up Lossoth faction. I have only one active character and I barely have enough time to do allt he stuff in game I want to. This works for me just fine but that is a matter of my preference:) I think here is the matter of differences in playing styles so I chose not to discuss the issue any further. To answer the OP's question - no, I don't think rep building is ruining the game. |
|
| |
||
|
WSIMike 4/25/08 3:51:14 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 3/09/04
"This Space For Rent" |
Originally posted by Illyrian
Well, yeah... I didn't really explain that well... but in saying "you're already level 50", I mean that it's not like you're gaining the reputation passively as you level anyway... because you're already at cap... So once the quests are done (which don't reward sufficient rep on their own to "unlock" certain things, again, as I understand it), you have only grinding reputation to look forward to. That could be bad or not-so-bad... like anything else... depending on the person playing. I wasn't inferring that you get more or less rep based on your level. My bad :) |
|
|
|
||
|
Druz 4/25/08 3:51:16 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 8/31/07 |
There are quests I can do for fun, I get it that is great and I will be doing them |
|
|
Druz 4/25/08 3:56:57 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 8/31/07 |
Originally posted by WSIMike Thats exactly what I mean Mike, for a 50 it's a pain in the ass but for an up and coming player you know in the back of your mind that killing an extra few monsters here and there will lead you smoothly through reputation while if a level 50 is interested in the same thing we have to backtrack and solely do nothing but grind all at once. |
|
|
Yeebo 4/25/08 7:16:30 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 3/20/05 |
Color me crazy, but I think part of the point of the zone is to give bored 50s something they can make progress on solo if they are done with their virtues and crafting grinds. It seems to me that Turbine is trying to figure out a fun way to incentivize questing for characters that are capped out. One of the strengths of LoTRO is the quality of the quest writing. By adding rep to all the high level quests, they give you a reason to keep plugging away at quests without having to inflate the quest rewards too much. However, for rep to be an incentive to quest, some items have to be locked behind a rep grind. Otherwise what is the point? I usually hate rep grinds in MMOs. However because I can grind it out by questing in LoTRO, it doesn't irk me as much. I actually like having a good reason to keep questing at 50. Of course that's a personal thing, and your mileage will certainly vary. I think the reason I hated rep grinds in WoW was that very little progress could be made in most factions without grinding the hell out of some set of mobs, or at least doing the same 4 daily quests every single day until tasting the cold hard muzzle of a loaded .45 starts to sound enticing. Rep grinding in EQ was even worse. Not only did you have to grind the hell out of some specific mobs, usually the only reward you got was that you were no longer KoS in some cities. Bleah . . .
|
|
| I don't want to write this, and you don't want to read it. But now it's too late for both of us. |
||
|
Wrymstrum 4/25/08 8:31:29 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 11/28/07 |
Another thing I HATE about the rep system is all the rep items. These damn things clutter up my inventory space sooo bad. Does every single damn reputation need THREE different rep items? Sheesh.
Also I don't like how the 4 racial reps work. I'm a dwarf, and if I went the list of things that I have done for other dwarves in this game (all the quests and such, saving the land, etc) it would be pretty long. Yet they want me to go spend hours collecting little trinkets for them. WTF.
Another thing that turned me off from the rep system at the start was the crafting rep items. At first when I heard you could craft items and turn them in for rep, i though, "hey, that's kind of intersting." Then when I looked at what it took to make those insignias and found out how much rep you got, it was ridiculous! It took an insane amount of ore to make an item that gave an incredibly small amount of rep. It was such a slap in the face. |
|
| ~~~ Currently Playing ~~~ Conan- Zoltar <Angels of Death> Guardian on Stormrage. |
||