| Thread (9 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
yegnats 4/18/08 2:19:58 AM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/01/07 |
This entire system is focused around having 16GB of memory; why? To create a 10-11gb ramdisk to place the current MMORPG being played onto, so the hard drive to RAM bottleneck is eliminated during gameplay. My only problem is, I can't seem to find a decent motherboard to place this 16gb of memory on, as well as being able to harbor a current generation CPU and GPU. Any suggestions? |
|
| |
||
|
chakl337 4/18/08 6:59:23 AM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 12/10/05
I DO NOT PAY MONTHLY FEES to be A BLIND LOYALIST.I would rather GET PAID to be 1. |
Check this maybe? Not sure if you're into Mac Pros, but they're like the closest thing that can even exceed your 16gb RAM reqs (32gb max there on the spec page). Of course another thing to factor in is that you'll have to multi boot to accommodate said MMORPGs if some of those are Win based. However I do have a question...Are you really sure about the calculated efficiencies you're gunning for? |
|
|
yegnats 4/18/08 1:37:10 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/01/07 |
Well, I have heard in the past with smaller video games, like FPS, where gamers would load the entire game onto a RAMdisk so they would have instant load times to have an edge against the competition. But, what I'm wondering is; Could you actually load Windows Vista onto Mac hardware like that? |
|
| |
||
|
Varlok91 4/18/08 1:42:33 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 1/30/07
"History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it." -Winston Churchill |
Originally posted by yegnats You realize that if the game is being played through a 32-bit emulator on a 64-bit OS it will still only be able to use 2 gigs of RAM for the game (which is more than enough). Why go with 16 gigs? Thats only needed for servers, 8 or even 4 gigs will suffice. Your theory is very interesting, but I don't think it would work well in most games. Maybe once we start getting native 64 bit clients. |
|
| -------------------------------- |
||
|
yegnats 4/18/08 1:55:13 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/01/07 |
I suppose my theory is kinda overkill, perhaps I have just been playing games like Lord of the Rings Online, which seem to be inadequately coded for loading texture files to memory in a speedy fashion without causing stutters on the fly. Or, perhaps my hard drive is just getting old; as is all my hardware, second best stuff that I bought 3 years ago. Perhaps getting one of those SATA2 seagate barracudas with a 32mb cache will help with the bottlenecks, I only have a SATA2 western digital with a 16mb cache. I plan on running Vista Ultimate 64 bit, would it be worth it to get 8gb of ram? And for all you Vista haters, I'll also have 32 bit XP Pro on dual boot to fall back on if I experience any compatibility issues. Perhaps, with certain MMORPGs that don't pack all their game files into a pack file (like WoW), I could find some way to force load all the player models, textures, sounds associated with all armor, equipments and abilities used in the game into the memory, as that seems to be what is swapped around the most in memory during gameplay; causing the stutters. |
|
| |
||
|
Varlok91 4/18/08 2:27:28 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 1/30/07
"History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it." -Winston Churchill |
Originally posted by yegnatsDDR2 RAM is so cheap right now I wouldn't call purchasing 8 gigs insane, but you will be more than happy with 4 gigs assuming you don't do some insane multi-tasking. As for the hard drive, among the fastest hard drives out right now is the 640 gig WD hard drive. The seagate 7200.11s are plenty fast as well. |
|
| -------------------------------- |
||
|
Arndur 4/18/08 5:05:40 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 4/26/07
Keep it clean |
Yeah i met some people yesterday who when 1gig of ram was still extermely expnesive they bought a stick and loaded quake 3 into it. The lvls loaded extermely fast. And if you win the lottery go buy a 15 mil computer just for the hell of it. 128 processors each more powerful then 200 of the leading dual cores a terabyte of ram and a exabyte of hard drive space. You could run wow from that thing. |
|
| Prepare to drop
AMD 4800 2.4ghz-3GB RAM 533mhz-EVGA 9500GT 512mb-320gb HD |
||
|
yegnats 4/18/08 5:20:15 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/01/07 |
Originally posted by Arndur
|
|
| |
||
|
CleffyII 4/18/08 5:41:59 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 7/22/06 |
If you want 16+ gigs of ram on a non-server Motherboard. You are pretty much limited to AM2+. Intel Boards with that much ram have old Northbridges. Of the AM2+ boards. Its also limited to the Gigabyte 790FX, and 790X boards for a descent board. Don't get the ECS or 780G boards though. ECS is kinda a bad manufacturer. The current 780G boards also don't have enough juice to support a phenom processor. Despite what others may say. The new phenoms, specifically the 9850 BE run very well. Clock for Clock they are very close to being on parallel with Core2Quad. Just remember to buy a phenom thats XX50, and not XX00. Also the 9800GX2 is a waste. Its like running 2 8800 GTS (G80) in sli. Just like the last iteration of X2 video cards that are remarkably unremarkable. |
|