| 111 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
4/03/08 11:55:15 AM#21
Originally posted by Deathstrike2 Baaaaa.
Go ahead, keep being a sheep.
Go back to sleep.
Oyjord. |
|
|
4/03/08 12:16:58 PM#22
Originally posted by Kryogenic And as long as we have sunshines like you, the world will still be filled with things to make us chuckle.
|
|
|
4/03/08 12:24:11 PM#23
Could be worse. EA could have bought CoX instead.
|
|
|
4/03/08 12:24:41 PM#24
I don't mind it so much, as it'll be done in a non-intrusive manner. Would be nice though that it tracks how long you have the option turned on. Maybe as an incentive have a couple of badges that you can earn for how ever much time you have it on. That way the player can get some immediate benefit while the extra ad income makes its way into the game. |
|
|
4/03/08 12:29:36 PM#25
Online games have a lifespan. They last as long as they're profitable for the parent company. If adding passive billboard ads make CoX profitable to NCSoft for a while longer, that's fine with me. |
|
|
4/03/08 12:29:48 PM#26
Fanboys? Or people who like the game and can read enough to find out that it's optional? If you consider any person a fanboy for thinking this is okay, then anyone who pays a monthly fee for anything should be considered one as well. And if, to you, these ads are similar to bending over, you might also want to consider working out and taking off a few hundred pounds. Companies will do these kinds of things when they need to. City of X is not the most popular game out there and I would be against a game like Blizzard's doing it. |
|
|
4/03/08 12:57:17 PM#27
Originally posted by Harafnir IT IS OPTIONAL – YOU CAN TURN THEM OFF ALL THE TIME AND NEVER EVER SEE THEM. |
|
|
Guintu
Novice Member
Joined: 1/25/05
I reject your reality and substitute my own. -Adam Savage from Mythbusters |
4/03/08 12:59:52 PM#28
I really don't see many people saying ok to the advertising unless their going to get something in return. I mean just so NCsoft can get more money to add content isn't going to be a good enough reason for most players. If they gave a discound like making it $5 a month or $15 for 2 months or even better F2P servers with advertising then I can see that working. Actually if they made servers that are F2P I know so many people hate ads in game that they would pay $15 a month just to not have the ads. I don't think NCsoft sees the big picutre, maybe a few people wouldn't mind the ads, but I know more people would hate them. I've read enough forums with people complaining about ads in games. I guarentee you that if the put ads in games and let people opt-out, probably about 85% or more will opt-out. I'm all for advertising in games, but I would even opt-out if I wasn't getting something for the ads. |
|
4/03/08 1:03:51 PM#29
Originally posted by Kryogenic Did anyone of you read the article, and about how they are optional and can be turned off? All of them, off all the time, for good? Did any of you read that? Do you get it? You just hit one check box and you never have to see them - EVER. So no one is being subjected to any adds ever.
Quote ----- So beyond all of this, what benefit does leaving optional in-game advertising “on” bring to the players? Why should you not opt-out? All ad revenue dollars go directly to the further development of the game, which means more great content than ever before! |
|
|
4/03/08 1:06:55 PM#30
Originally posted by Guintu I'll leave them on because I don't care. Yes I would be pissed if I didn't have to option, but because I do have the option I'm not pissed so I will leave them on. |
|
|
4/03/08 1:16:55 PM#31
@GreenChaos - No, they did not read it. They're unable. It should probably be put a bit simpler for them. |
|
|
4/03/08 1:20:31 PM#32
{quote} Could be worse. EA could have bought CoX instead. {/quote}
NOOOOO Don't say the "Unmentionable" name!!! You'll jinx everything!! |
|
|
4/03/08 1:22:36 PM#33
I'm planning on keeping the ads on, why? I like the game, and this is a way for me to further support it, without paying more for it. Those billboards scattered around the city / the isles are perfect for this. Wether they say "Earth for humans" or "pizzahut, get pizza now!" doesn't really matter to me tbh. ------------------------------ |
|
|
4/03/08 1:23:52 PM#34
Originally posted by Guintu I see what you're saying, but the end result of this project is to make the gaming experience better (or so they say). They could push whatever revenue they make from this into F2P servers, but that doesnt further the development of the game necessarily. Personally, i would much prefer that they roll money into faster/better updates that give us great new content for the game. How long have people wanted end game content? Imagine that these in game ads add enough revenue to hire 2 more devs to dedicate to end game content. I dont see how this can be a bad thing given the framework they've laid out. That being said, tho, i would be curious to see quarterly reports as to how much money this project brings in and what it's being utilized for... simply to ensure they keep their promises. |
|
|
4/03/08 1:24:28 PM#35
I see this move by NCSoft more of a "Choose to see the ads and we'll keep investing in the game and not changing the montly fee". The other side of it, for me, would be "Choose to not see the ads and, by the same monthly fee, we'll start charging you for the upcoming content updates". I liked the in game fictional ads - they kept the immersion of it. But I don't think they'll reduce the monthly fee. So I guess I'll choose to see the commercial ads then. |
|
|
4/03/08 1:28:16 PM#36
Originally posted by GuintuYou've already received 10 content releases with no additional charge (unless you purchased either title after the one you already had (H/V)). Other MMOs would charge extra as content releases. The entire purpose of the in-game ads are to allow for the team to expand. So you are getting something in return.
Hopefully you play the game to enjoy it. You'd pay the same price with or without the ads. The OPTION is there for you. It's really that simple. If you don't think it's fair, then don't allow it. There. Was that really all that difficult? Nope. Game on! |
|
|
4/03/08 1:43:00 PM#37
I mean its likely one of the games biggest complaints, low frequency of updates or additional content so its good that they are tring too move things along at a faster pace here |
|
|
4/03/08 1:47:29 PM#38
Originally posted by Unrealevil No you're obviously not bright enough to extrapolate anything from people's posts that don't agree with your opinion with simple-minded sycophantism. Yes I read the whole article and I do know that the advertising in optional. It's the wording in the article that set me off. Did you read it? It's an obvious corporate spin to lead people to believe that they are going to try to breath new life into a game as old as CoX is, and it's an even bigger spin to lead people to believe that the lion's share of that ad revenue is going to go the development of new content for the game. I agree that the way they are implementing the in-game ads is alot better than the majority of other games with in-game advertising. It doesn't change or alter the current trend in commercialized gaming for the better either. Look at games like SKATE, nothing but product placement after product placement and the game cost exactly the same as every other game that came out at the same time. The other games were just as good if not, better than SKATE. If you've played it you know how much product placement is in it. The single player campaign is like one big commercial for a bunch of different brands of clothing and skateboarding accessories. Those companies pay money to get their ads into games. When a game is saturated that much with commercial bullshit the game shouldn't cost the same as a game that isn't as saturated. If it does than shame on the people behind the decision to charge full price for commercial advertizing. Why does this happen more and more often? Because people with no minds blindly become sheep and make this kind of practice more acceptable than it was before. You people need to get out in the world some more and stop worshiping at the alter of corporate shills. |
|
|
4/03/08 1:47:43 PM#39
Originally posted by FeldronI'm sure it has something to do with it. Statesman held much back though, for whatever reason. They've been extremely active since November (completion of the sale) and should be commended for everything they've done. Champions Online, while thematically similar, will play differently. I look forward to both. :) |
|
|
airborne519
Novice Member
Joined: 8/16/06
Few men are born brave. Many become so through training and force of discipline. |
4/03/08 1:47:55 PM#40
Did some of you miss the part that it was optional to have ads?? I could give a flying F_ _ _ ! Some of you like to bitch for the sake of bitching..
|