| Thread (107 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Goldknyght 3/18/08 3:59:24 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/12/06
It''s one thing to have a opinion, but enforcing one is unconstitutional. |
Originally posted by neonaka Well you guys keep making me laugh i forget what the hell i say maybe but this is what will be said for sure. we will use Best Buy as well again Im manager of Best Buy, I have Sony come in and they say we will give you our products. They put the products on the shelf. Ok now Best buy just starteded a review of products whatever. Well one of the best buy employee reviews just Ragged on a Sony product the XBR4 Bravia i mean really roasted it. Sony sends a letter to the manager saying hey get rid of this dude or you lose our products. Hmm you let me know what they are going to do. |
|
|
Khalathwyr 3/18/08 4:12:16 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 6/02/04
Google is your friend. |
Originally posted by Goldknyght It will work as I have a realistic idea of how much revenue Diamond VIP members generate for Hilton Hotels Corporation per year and you don't. Suffice it to say it is more than the hundred of thousands Eidos was paying Gamespot. But hey, you just want to argue and not actually listen to ideas from other people who have experience in aspects of life you don't. As proven with your back and forth with Stradden, you just want the "last word". Anything anyone says that doesn't agree with your view you disregard. So, there really is no point in continuing a conversation with you. Best of luck in whatever you do. You'll need it. (taking bets now that he has to have one more reply to this to have the last word) |
|
| The Themepark Method of making MMOs is structured entertainment, akin to a puzzle. I prefer a legos style where I can build what I want and something new everyday. |
||
|
Woopin 3/18/08 4:13:41 PM
|
||
|
MMORPG.COM Staff
Joined: 3/14/07 |
Can we please go back on topic?
This is not the General Discussion / Off Topic forums. |
|
| ---------------- R.I.P. * Laura "Taera" Genender * |
||
|
Goldknyght 3/18/08 4:32:47 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/12/06
It''s one thing to have a opinion, but enforcing one is unconstitutional. |
Originally posted by Khalathwyr
|
|
|
templarga 3/18/08 6:03:09 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 5/13/04 |
In an attempt to get this back on topic, I have a question about this overall thread: 1. How does the fact that, even if this is true (to the extent the arguments here assume), how does this equate to worries about Age of Conan? In other words, why as a consumer should I be concerned about Eidios involvement? Its not like their pressure on Gamespot did a lot; there are 1000s of reviewers and review sites out there. My point is that all we have is circumstantial evidence that the events occured as it is stated they did. And also, other than Eidios LIMITED involvement with Age of Conan, how does it effect me, a future player of AOC? Shady dealings, back-room deals and this type of thing happens all the time in the public and private sector. This is just one case of probably 100s that don't get reported. I am not saying that its right, and I am truly sorry that the reviewer got terminated because I think he was good at his job (and I really liked his reviews), but this one instance should not equate to doom cast all over Age of Conan like many seem to think it will. If we took every unethical business practice into account and tried to prevent ourselves from being affiliated with any company that does something questionable, I think we would probably have to live in a very very secluded area with little contact from the outside world. If you want proof of what I am talking about, do a little research into how Wal-Mart treats its suppliers and certain employees.
EDIT: Clarity and typos |
|
| |
||
|
markyturnip 3/18/08 9:13:44 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 11/03/05 |
All said and done, none of this makes the blindest bit of difference to me regarding wthether I will buy this game. I never rely on one review anyway - and find that in aggregate the broad picture emerging from multiple reviewers is not too bad. I tend to find that games in the 90s in metacritic are genuinely better than games in the 70s... shenanigans notwithstanding. If a review site is stupid enough to score according to ad dollars received, it won't be long til it loses credibility and clicks.. and therefore more advertising dollars in the long run. |
|
| |
||
|
solareus 3/18/08 9:34:13 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 9/20/06
"Eye for an Eye" |
It just wasn't some "reviewer" either, it was one of the best reviewers in the industry, Jeff Gerstmann.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Goldknyght 3/19/08 9:46:30 AM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/12/06
It''s one thing to have a opinion, but enforcing one is unconstitutional. |
Originally posted by solareus Well if he was the best review in the industry he would of known what not to do and would of chose a more tact-ful way to roast this game |
|
|
Shannia 3/19/08 9:56:43 AM
|
||
|
| ||