| Thread (31 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Hexxeity 3/12/08 4:13:01 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 2/21/07 |
Originally posted by Brynn Just because I GIVE my opinion, it doesn't mean I think it's the only important one. Also, I'm not even naysaying, you touchy fanboys. I'm sure there are many people who will find this game appealing. My points were: 1) "Innovative" is an overused buzzword that does not apply to many of the elements in this game (not that that makes it a bad game), and 2) I am probably not going to be in the group of people who find this game appealing. |
|
| |
||
|
checkthis500 3/12/08 4:31:07 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 9/15/05 |
Originally posted by Lord.Bachus You know your comment is very strange. You say that it's going to be the PvP game to beat, but you also say that it's mostly PvE based? I'm pretty sure games like AoC and WAR that are pretty much focused on PvP from start to finish will be the PvP games to beat for years to come. :p |
|
| --------------------------------------------- |
||
|
Brynn 3/12/08 5:44:23 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 12/17/03 |
I think what this poster said is about as close as we will get to innovation. The definition fits most innovation. |
|
| |
||
|
BarCrow 3/13/08 4:00:42 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 2/25/07 |
This is the game I am looking forward to. Just hope it isn't dwarfed by AoC or WAR. The fact that this doesnt rely..or doesnt seem to rely... on uber gear....appeals to me. I always hate the argument that someone who plays for a zillion hours deserves to have better gear than someone who can only play odd and unscheduled hours. Maybe in a F2p game..this makes more sense(but cash stores take care of this problem)...but in a monthly service...no matter how much you play..We still pay the same monthly price. So someone playing 6 mnths at 2-4 hours a week or another for 6 mnths at 30+ hours a week ...both spend the same $90.00(or so). I agree that there should be some kind of reward for time spent actually online and playing...but it shouldn't be one that so greatly limits certain gaming elements for those who are offline more often(through no desire of their own)...but still paying loyally every month. |
|
| then: WOW/SWG/COX/UO//DDO(some):EVE/LOTR/AO/MTRXO/2MOONS/9DRAGONS/DAoC |
||
|
hyena69 3/14/08 11:22:48 AM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/28/07 |
I wouldn't touch this game with a ten foot pole. Not saying it's bad, but several of the so called innovations would make this game a waste of time for me:
Gear not affecting stats. Come on, somebody covered from head to toe in plate armour plays the same as somebody in a bikini. Suspension of disbelief instantly shattered for me
Aiming. Haven't bothered playing games with aiming and dodging for 5-6 years. Not starting now
Discrimantion of nonnative players. Either a game is released simultaneously all around the world, and gets equal support, or I don't play it. Wouldn't touch any of the korean imports even if I was paid for it, and even though living in Europe I'd be on the sweet side this time, I will never ever waste money or time on games or companies that do not realise that MMOs are global. Propably means I'll pass on WAR as well, don't know if AoC will discriminate this way
So, propably a good game, hope it doesn't join AA, Earth and Beyond (soon Tabula Rasa as well) in the graveyard, but I ain't going to play it.
Forgot to add: Excellent review loads and loads of usefull information that gave me the possibility to make up my mind whether this is a game for me or not :-) |
|
| |
||
|
Brynn 3/14/08 3:40:09 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 12/17/03 |
Some gamers have a wait and see attitude, at least until it's released and then they can see what others say. Don't American developers release sometimes here before overseas? I know, for PvP, a universal release is best. |
|
| |
||