| 70 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
11/20/07 11:55:02 AM#21
You all should learn to whine less , FLS ( Flagship studios) havent said anything about selling out.
If SOE gets into this they will only handle the online account / billing system. |
|
|
11/20/07 12:14:05 PM#22
With all those SOE hate thread. Show the board get it's own "We are angry at SOE" or something?
Just a suggestion. |
|
|
11/20/07 12:17:22 PM#23
I think if you post 5 times in 15 different SOE hate threads, you get a bumper sticker, and after 10 posts in 35 threads you can download a special "I hate SOE and am a whining loser" avatar. Matching that in we hate EA threads gets you a 1337 signature download also.
|
|
|
Kyleran
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
A simple truth-"What people want and what is good for an mmo is not always the same thing"-mrw0lf |
11/20/07 1:33:52 PM#24
Originally posted by ShanniaEr..... can you please link any news stories you have that report that the distribution of the PotBS pre-orders are "all" screwed up? I did a quick search, found some articles about the delays due to the fires in CA, but can't find this other information you've reference. Regardless, there's a month or more till the game starts, plenty of time to straighten out any issues.....
"Just because you aren't paying doesn't mean it's not PTW." - Amaranthar |
|
11/20/07 1:35:35 PM#25
Originally posted by kwai
Rick Saada - FLS Dev & EPFBM |
|
|
11/20/07 2:37:04 PM#26
Originally posted by Shannia Well I would guess if things are as bad as you are saying then FLS should switch to another partner for launching the game. It is FLS's business and it is their success or failure to manage. If SOE isn't performing then they need to decide to go with another company. Honestly it is stupid to think that SOE is screwing up to cause FLS to fail so they can buy the game... I suppose SOE has people in black helicopters flying around shooting FLS developers up with drugs to numb there brains while they are at it... If FLS is successful I'm sure that is a good thing for SOE. If FLS fails I'm not sure that is a good thing for SOE.... Buying a failed game is also something I'm not sure SOE will do for every case I mean how many can you buy before enough is enough?
|
|
|
11/20/07 4:10:11 PM#27
hi you're special. all i'm saying is that ppl are naive to think that EA or MS are going to be any better than SOE. sorry didn't know that wasn't clear enough for you. die. <3 |
|
|
Shannia
Novice Member
Joined: 11/06/05
"World of WarCraft is held alive solely by the mediocrity of competing products." RendRegen |
11/20/07 5:54:20 PM#28
Originally posted by project8six I'm not saying that M$ and EA are perfect. Far from it. More often than not, those two companies do get other people's MMORPGs to market without a hitch. With SoE, you can't show me one example of where SoE was responsible with publishing/marketing/distribution of someone else's MMORPG where it was without problems, yet there own stuff shows up on shelves like magic most of the time!
Fear not fanbois, we are not trolls, let's take off your tin foil hat and learn what VAPORWARE is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware "Vaporware is a term used to describe a software or hardware product that is announced by a developer well in advance of release, but which then fails to emerge after having well exceeded the period of development time that was initially claimed or would normally be expected for the development cycle of a similar product." |
|
11/20/07 6:18:13 PM#29
Lol, this is old news...a very old old news. FLS doesn't listen to what we said before and do not hold your breath that they will now. PotBS will be ruin and thanks to SOE. Another SCORE for SOE! To FLS, you guys better get a good marketing company. SOE stinks! And it's all over the net, almost all of the gaming board that I go to has issues about SOE. Goodluck, I hope I see you ingame! __________________ |
|
|
11/20/07 10:33:52 PM#30
Originally posted by Shanniawhat other games are you talking about? as far as I know the only game soe did that they didn't own is vanguard. matrix they had nothing to do with until after it was dead then they picked it up...
|
|
|
lol. this game is going down hill, there going to take out PoTBS, i can assure you they will. with how the launch is going right now. EA/GWF would do a much better job then SOE.EA selling alot of good games and not having problems. GWF would have a good publishing and distribution. |
|
|
11/22/07 10:49:42 AM#32
And we would have so much to play with: PotbS´08, PotbS: Most Wanted, PotbS Revenge. Then PotbS ´09...
|
|
|
11/27/07 5:58:53 PM#33
The problem with SoE is they pick up all these games but put no effort or money into them. They ditched G&H because they weren't willing to invest anything into the development. So basically they were willing to publish a crappy game as long as they make money off of it but they aren't willing to take the risk. They forced vanguard out about a year ahead of what it should have been for the same reason. To cash in and take over the game knowing it would never succeed in the shape it was in. Why anyone would play any game that has anything to do with SoE is beyond me. They have been screwing over their customers for years with all their piss poor management of MMO's. They don't give a flying fuck about putting out a solid game they only care about the bottom line. It's too bad they can't figure out that making a good game would make them alot more money than all these bullshit deals with all the games they destroy. |
|
|
11/27/07 6:39:04 PM#34
Originally posted by skeptical Actually, SOE wasn't ever an investor in G&H. That was all Perpetual's baby. Just like us, Perpetual contracted with SoE Platform Publishing to do distribution (although they chose to do their own billing). SOE was only going to make money off the box sales, and spent quite a bit on marketing for ship dates that Perpetual kept failing to meet. Eventually they chose to distance themselves from the game because they could see where things were going. They *did* put money and effort into the marketing (magazine and web ads) but not into the development. It's not that they ditched G&H because they cut off Perpetual's money, that was never the arrangement. They may have had an opportunity to step in when Perpetual started to implode that they chose not to take (I don't know about that), but they distanced themselves just because they *didn't* want their name on the crappy game G&H was looking to be. As for Vanguard, as has been covered numerous times, they didn't *force* anything. Sigil, and it's CEO Brad McQuaid, were the ones who chose to ship the game before it was ready. SOE was just left to pick up the pieces after Sigil imploded. SOE should get credit for the fact that Vanguard is still operating at all, not blame for Sigil's mistakes. Rick Saada - FLS Dev & EPFBM |
|
|
11/27/07 6:42:13 PM#35
Rick, You're going to have to stop interjecting logic, reasoning, an facts in your posts. The anti-SOE folks won't know how to deal with them.
/tk |
|
|
11/28/07 7:56:15 AM#36
''Microsoft had wanted to launch this thing in July of 2006,'' Mr. Smedley said. ''We felt like the game needed more time, and we have given it more time, but at some point enough is enough, and we have to ship the game and start generating revenue.'' -John Smedley
Sorry Rick, SOE pulled the trigger on the release date. Saying the Sigil "chose" to launch is about as far from the truth as one could spin things. SOE had all the bargaining power in the deal and I'm sure John is no dummy seeing what the likely outcome would be if the game failed.
|
|
|
11/28/07 10:24:21 AM#37
Originally posted by RickSaada I agree w/this completely, even as a long time SOE customer w/mixed emotions (Eq1 and Eq2 are superior and the benchmark for the ENTIRE industry, yet look at what they did to SWG which could have been the finest video game in the known universe). Now (PC online): Eq2, Vanguard, Planetside, SWG |
|
|
11/28/07 11:14:34 AM#38
Look at SWG. No advertising for the game whatsoever until the NGE hit. Then it's all over the TV and internet. Too bad they didn't promote the game when it was in its greatness. |
|
|
11/28/07 1:00:26 PM#39
hawkeye74, looked at your sig and see you love Star Wars. Shame G&H or STO wont be making it to launch.
To me... SOE's mistake with SWG is hard to ignore since I was directly hit by it. I dont care about Vanguard or EQ. I was always a UO guy anyway. Even owned a boat in that game too. A company that can ignore a playerbase and not even bat an eyelash at losing 75% sub base doesnt scream "trustworthy quality game makers". So of course people are hesitant to deal business with them. The whole problems with the pre-order didnt help either. |
|
|
11/28/07 2:19:55 PM#40
LOL oh god that's such a bummer, SOE probably waved a wad of money in FLB's face while brainwashing them. They don't have to be involved in development to destroy a game, the devs however becomes puppets of the decision makers from SOE. This was proven in PlanetSide before they moved their office from San Diego to Austin.
SWTOR: sub ended, no thanks to Georg Zoeller! |
|