| Thread (31 posts) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
poi_ftw 11/20/07 11:30:17 PM
|
||||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 12/07/06 |
All four of these games seem great to me and really can't decide too much between them which one I want to play. Which one do you think will be the best of them, and why do you think it will be??
Forum Poll
|
|||
| |
||||
|
GreenChaos 11/20/07 11:45:23 PM
|
||||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 10/21/06 |
All the cool kids are into Chronicles of Spellborn. Everyone else is just not in the know. |
|||
|
Skoll 11/21/07 7:11:30 AM
|
||||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 3/04/04
You have no body, no blood, no bones, you are but a |
Warhammer, because of my blind loyalty for Mythic. |
|||
| Blood for the Blood God! Skulls for the Skull Throne! |
||||
|
Samuraisword 11/21/07 8:07:32 AM
|
||||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 2/15/06
Gamers who use RMT are like athletes who use steroids. |
= |
|||
| |
||||
|
Tamish 11/21/07 8:09:17 AM
|
||||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 10/17/07 |
If you had included darkfall on the list, I would say that. As you haven't, AOC. |
|||
| |
||||
|
Shannia 11/21/07 10:29:31 AM
|
||||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 11/06/05
"We''re not making a game for Trekkies" Daron Stinnett, Perpetual Entertainment |
AoC. Why? Because people over their without guild tags in their signatures speak with open minds both good and bad about the game. At the same time, if the person has a guild tag on over there, you will hardly ever find them saying anything against the game or funcom. It is funny watching them all suck up to funcom about how wonderful everything is over there and how funcom can do wrong. Want proof of what I'm talking about? http://forums.ageofconan.com/showthread.php?t=44759&page=1 You won't find a single complaint from a person with a guild tag.
|
|||
| "I'll take MMO disasters for $50, Alex." "This MMO release in 2008 lost half its player base in the first month after massive hype of non existent features" "What is Age of Conan?" ... "Correct, for $50, Ed2099"! |
||||
|
Tamish 11/21/07 10:34:32 AM
|
||||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 10/17/07 |
I just like the look of AoC. I don't have any experince playing but the PvP looks cool. The only thing I'm questioning is if 9 battlekeeps will be enough, but time will tell. |
|||
| |
||||
|
Untouchable8 11/21/07 10:38:09 AM
|
||||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 6/13/06 |
star trek: online |
|||
|
Shoal 11/21/07 10:41:07 AM
|
||||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 9/30/04 |
A and CoS are, I think, not going to be broad enough or deep enough. Nor do they have the necessary IP to be a wide draw outside the mainstream. AoC is being done by Funcom, who have proved year after year that they are unable to put out, or fix, their badly flawed AO product. So, that leaves WAR. Being produced by Mythic, who made the very (for the time) successfull Dark Age of Camelot. At the time, EQ1 had ~450k subscribers, and I belive DAoC achieved (before WoW), something on the order of ~250k to ~300k subscribers. Some of those were taken from EQ1, and some were new. But, DAoC was the second only to EQ1 MMORPG until WoW took over. So, I vote for WAR
|
|||
| |
||||
|
Shoal 11/21/07 10:42:03 AM
|
||||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 9/30/04 |
Originally posted by Untouchable8 ROFLMAO From the same company that flopped G&H ? I don't think so. |
|||
| |
||||
|
Coman 11/21/07 10:49:34 AM
|
||||