| 114 posts found | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
4/13/07 10:12:26 AM#61
Originally posted by Laiina Dude, that was really, really deep. Give me a minute to reflect on your awesomeness. |
|||||
|
4/13/07 11:30:39 AM#62
Originally posted by DMEnoc Well said, That is the main reason why my guild of 50 people quit vanguard. Issues involving performances. I have more then the minimum spec and i still dip below 5 fps in groups. |
|||||
|
4/13/07 11:36:09 AM#63
Man.. gotta love a thread that attracts all the resident "haters". It's sweet you guys could come together, spew forth enough bullsh!t to fill a swimming pool, then all jump in at the same time. The original poster was right on, and I respect his view. To bad it had to be dog-piled by the rest of you dillusional "I don't like this game, so noone else will. In fact, I'll warn people to stay away, because it's the right thing to do." crowd. |
|||||
|
4/13/07 11:41:10 AM#64
Originally posted by smg77
You hate SOE so much that you automatically hate this game. Have you ever played this game? Or do you hate Vanguard which is owned and run by Sigil because you hate SOE. It makes no damn sense. Even your avatar signature has you bashing the hell out of SOE. Look....you hate SOE with a passion...I think we know this based on 100% of your posts here; it's very obvious. And that's fine. I hate SOE too .....but... ...hanging out in Vangaurd and saying Vanguard sucks because you hate SOE doesnt make a lick of sense. SOE had nothing to do with the development of the game. It has nothing to do with the patches, it has nothing to do with Sigil. Seriously, if you hate SOE so much you really should be over at Star Wars Galaxies or EverQuest 2 or Matrix Online or Everquest or Planetside. Those game either were developed by SOE or now is being continued with SOE. If you hate Vanguard at least have a valid reason why you hate it (like you think Sigil sucks, the coding sucks, the FPS sucks, or something like that) give some Sigil/Vanguard reasons but dont hate a game because of a situation that does not exist. You know its bad when a fellow "hater" of Vangaurd has to defend the game lol.....however, I have to speak up. I hate Vanguard to but you really need to point the finger to the correct people. You remind me of those people who blame the devil for everything. Someone kills their parents and they said the Devil made me do it or someone gets caught drinking and driving or had an affair and they say the devil made me do it. Yes, the devil is a bad person and he sucks, but when you go around blaming the devil for everything people are just going to stop taking you seriously. |
|||||
|
4/13/07 11:53:09 AM#65
Originally posted by Dawgrum yeah....all of us haters are these secret people who came out of the woodwork and shadows who never played the game or who was never was a fan of the game or never followed the game for the last four years. ....maybe there is a reason why there is so many people here who hate the game. There could be a correlation between that and Vanguard. Maybe? But seriously, I have seen just as many bad vanbois as i have haters. Your arguments would have been valued if you seen the people who didnt like the game give a 30 page synopsis of why they dont like it and why others would be waisting their money buying it only for the vanbois to blurt out the exact same immature statement you did. The fact is this: 1. These forums arent censored like FoH, Silky Venom, and Tentonhammer is. If you dont want to see people posting negatively about a game you're gonna have to either skip those threads, read em and deal with it, or not go here at all. Sorry.....but when you feel taken advantaged of by Sigil, you're gonna post about it over and over. Its human nature. 2. These forums do get moderated. If someone says something totally out of line and attack someone else's character because they do like the game then report them. Other than that, everyone is entitled to their opinion here; whether its a thought out written one or not.
|
|||||
|
4/13/07 12:23:55 PM#66
Originally posted by Enigma I'm not concerned if you value my arguments or not. Ive been frequenting this board since closed beta.. trust me I witnessed what you are talking about. There were just as many constructive positive posts torn to shreads by immature remarks as well. That street goes both ways, I'm sad to see you try to make a point on such shaky ground. My favorite part of your post... "there is so many people here who hate the game". If by "so many" you mean the 15-20 that frequent this forum, the ones who my post was directed at, then you need to come to grips with reality. You are the minority, plain and simple, it's just hard to tell becuase you inflate every thread on this board with the same old BS.
|
|||||
|
4/13/07 3:15:56 PM#67
Originally posted by EnigmaYeah, but the point is, Brad more than likely hasn't said "no" to every single thing that SOE suggested. So if even one suggestion made it through (quite a few are evident as is), then it's fact that SOE has some control over Vanguard. Now, does that mean folks should get carried away and think Vanguard is on it's way to a SWG-esque fate? Nope. But people will do it anyway. I can understand why Sigil wouldn't want to comment on just where every single idea or change originated from with all the bad stigma they get from SOE, but it's still worth being realistic about the matter. Brad's more than likely the bottom line, but ultimately it's SOE's job to sell the game. If the game hasn't been selling well (doesn't seem to be), and the case thus far has been that Brad has been listening to SOE less than he should've, then in my opinion, we can only expect increasing SOE influence down the line. I'd hope so, if SOE were able to reverse the situation of Vanguard better than Sigil could. |
|||||
|
4/13/07 3:22:35 PM#68
Originally posted by DawgrumNow that I am enjoying VG (inspite of my expectations) I just come here to watch the dog and pony show!!! All 15 of the hardcore haters are very funny!!! |
|||||
|
4/14/07 4:24:39 AM#69
Originally posted by Dawgrum
The minority are you, fans of this game. The rest of us are either 'haters', 'realists' or we just plain don't give a shit. Currently Playing: Everything but MMORPGs |
|||||
|
RonnyRulz
Novice Member
Joined: 9/14/06
This forum''s opinion is worth less than a stray dog crapping in a forest that no one cares about. |
4/14/07 10:57:45 AM#70
From my experience, there are two types of games (MMO's mostly) that handle lag and fps. The first one does it, IMO, the right way. Your frames stay the same, but the character models "warp" when affected by lag. The second, which is Vanguard, handles lag poorly. Instead of letting the latency and internet part handle the lag, it handles it in terms of fps. Instead of characters "warping" around because of lag (Client loses their info, but gets it back causing a "warp") it decides to LAG EVERYTHING! I don't understand why your fps has to do with your internet latency or server latency. Most games handle it by keeping the fps seperate from the latency issues. I know it's the latency's fault for causing lag in cities too, I've proven it to myself. The character models, movement, and animations do NOT justify the heavy drop in fps. On the contary, the fps only drops when it is in a laggy area. In a less laggy area, with the same number of pixels, character models, animations, etc, the fps DON'T drop. Also the fact I can turn my game to MAX PERFORMANCE, walk into a city area with NO PLAYER MODELS on screen, and drop to 5 fps because it's so laggy. Fps dropping has to be because of your computer not being able ot handle the pixels, or the server/client latency lowering your fps to be one with the lag. I've tested the polygon, pixel, character models/movement part, and my comp can perfectly handle it. It's only when encountering a player character that lag occurs. Unless I'm somehow mistaken and ignorant, I do not see how their character model and movement is so draining on my comp, despite the fact that I can have a TON more npc character models and movement without any fps drop. It's HAS to do with the other client's latency in relation to yours and the server. Thus, unless I'm missing something, it HAS to do with the fact they decided to handle lag by freezing everyone's frames (a.k.a. lowering them to become "one" with the bad latency) For Vanguard....... Latency = fps That said..................WTF? Why would you EVER drop someone's fps based on bad latency? Some games, mainly the good ones, handle latency by "warping" the characters, not lagging EVERYONE'S fps!!!!!!!! WTF? |
||||
|
4/14/07 12:24:39 PM#71
Originally posted by xAlrythx Subs has nothing to do with the trolls that frequent this board. Nice try though. |
|||||
|
4/14/07 12:27:10 PM#72
|
|||||
|
Die_Scream
Novice Member
Joined: 9/11/06
Did everything just taste purple there for a second? |
4/14/07 12:36:18 PM#73
i'd just like to say Enigma, I truly respect you and enjoy reading your posts. Its great to have you at MMORPG bringing some class to the boards.
Dawgrum, if you are a MMORPG "hater", do as you fans always say and "go back to Silkyvenom"(WoW). You like the game, others don't, deal. This thread is far more mild than most of the so called hater threads I've seen on these boards. I for one, am enjoying the discussion. |
||||
|
4/14/07 12:46:09 PM#74
Originally posted by Die_Scream Friend, I'm not playing Vanguard atm, I don't have any agenda behind my posts. |
|||||
|
4/14/07 12:52:11 PM#75
Originally posted by Enigma I have never said that SOE is responsible for Vanguard being a crappy game. What I have said is that I believe they are responsible for things like double xp weekends, making the game less hardcore and forcing Brad to ease up on things like xp rate and travel time. I have also said that I believe that eventually Sigil will sell the game outright to SOE and that SOE will then inflict an NGE-style update on the game. You are taking my position and making it a lot more complicated than it really is. The reason that I spend a lot of time in the Vanguard forum is because I don't want other developers to team up with SOE in the future. If Sigil had stayed with Microsoft I likely would have bought the game when it was released and played it. Based on things I have seen since release I doubt I would have stayed but I would have given it a chance but the fact that they got into bed with SOE just saved me the hassle because even if Vanguard had been a great game, I believe that SOE would have screwed it up somehow. |
|||||
|
Die_Scream
Novice Member
Joined: 9/11/06
Did everything just taste purple there for a second? |
4/14/07 2:41:26 PM#76
Originally posted by DawgrumI believe you, I just don't agree with the assumption that its 15-20 people who come here to bash the game. I will agree that there are some who are more vocal in their dislike though. |
||||
|
matraque
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/10/05
If i''m paying a monthly fee, i demand an unfinished game! |
4/14/07 4:23:11 PM#77
Works fine on my core2duo 6300 2go DDR 667 and my X1950pro.
i have about i have over 20fps all the time. If it drops, it comes back to 20+ really fast. 1152 x 864 Using omega drivers 6.5 and running ATI Tray tools I think it all matters on how you play with your settings. |
||||
|
4/14/07 4:23:47 PM#78
So i think what we are trying to say here is, "In closing: VG sucks."
Now, go do something productive. |
|||||
|
matraque
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/10/05
If i''m paying a monthly fee, i demand an unfinished game! |
4/14/07 4:26:39 PM#79
Originally posted by Phife It does sucks, to some. I personally like it. I'm I allowed? |
||||
|
4/14/07 4:28:09 PM#80
Originally posted by matraqueDENIED. No, you're allowed. I think the whole point of people posting their discontent though is for their own sake, not to convince you that you should be discontent. I doubt you'll ever shake that sneaking suspicion though. |
|||||