| 53 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
1/19/07 4:36:59 PM#21
I wish it was longer but the 23rd sounds about right. Estimated 3 day early start for preorders leaves 3 full days for Sigil to work on the game until launch. I'm interested to see what these forums look like once the game goes live. A person might be able to say something good about Vanguard without being flamed or called names. |
|
|
1/19/07 4:58:51 PM#22
Originally posted by Deron_Barak
Your joking right? this is BashMMORPG.com after all, all those who like whatever game they are in are probly too busy playing it to post anything good about their respective games, Vanguard will get bashed to bits even if it ends up a smash hit in the end (ala EVE and WoW). Like I said in my above post (which I do recommend you read before you flame me for this one, ta for the complements btw So ignoring the techical and coping 'issues' theres really nothing wrong with the game, it just isn't polished enough for some people. Bring on the WARRRRGGHH! |
|
|
1/19/07 5:21:08 PM#23
As someone else said already I'm glad there are people who will pay while Vanguard continues to beta test this game maybe in a year or so it will be ready for prime time. And it has little to do with the polish of WOW but getting what you pay for. If they are going to give the game out for free I would tell everyone to get a copy but the fact is they are going to be charging the same as most other companies charge for a completed product even though the game is full of bugs and lacks content. I'm sure they will get it worked out in time but should I have to pay for that not only in terms of cash but with also putting up with the frustration of waiting for the bugs to be worked out, I don't think so. |
|
|
Kyleran
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
A simple truth-"What people want and what is good for an mmo is not always the same thing"-mrw0lf |
1/19/07 5:32:32 PM#24
Originally posted by Dento
I'm willing to pay my sub fee and put up with the aggrevation for at least 3 months to see if they make forward progress.... if not... I'll drop and do something else. I do so of my own free will.. those who don't want to... please go play something else and maybe we'll see you later this year. "Just because you aren't paying doesn't mean it's not PTW." - Amaranthar |
|
1/19/07 6:37:51 PM#25
I personally have no problem with them releasing VG early because, quite frankly, I will not play it for at least 6 months in this state whether it is in beta or released. If having people pay for beta will ultimately make it a better game, I am all for it (they are just not going to get my money for it - and I have Station Pass).
As to the state of the game, the performance is abysmal for a game about to release. My system consists of a core 2 duo E6400, 2 x 7900gt in SLI, 2 gig RAM, 7200 rpm sata hd. Even with my system the hitching in the game is bad and makes playing annoying at best. Moreover, as stated a number of times above, the character animations are just plain bad. That truly is a problem for me. Despite the above, I really believe that VG can be a good game, but it is going to take a minimum of six months to hammer out the issues (but probably closer to one year). |
|
|
1/19/07 6:50:47 PM#26
Actually I agree with your points Kremlik. Vanguard will not be for everyone but it offers a lot for one MMO title. It does need polish, bells, whistles, etc. but it is a good game and has solid components. Beta 6 tester or not I would rather play VG than any other MMO out right now.
|
|
|
1/19/07 6:53:43 PM#27
Originally posted by CerionOther than the char gen these were all issues when WoW was released. Hell Vanguard's servers are more stable than what I experienced with WoW. At least in Vanguard it doesn't take me 10 minutes to loot a piece of boar tusk. I personally disagree on #5 though. As far as getting the game to run well I understand some people are having problems but I can't understand why when I get around 15 FPS most of the time (neglecting cities) on my P4 2.6 with 1 gig and nvidia 6600. I play on balance with NO .ini tweaks (the drop in quality wasn't worth the FPS) The animations are very hit and miss. My cleric with a 2h hammer looks great IMO. Looks like it really takes effort to move that thing around. I have a bard and the dual wielding animations were mostly ok with only 1 or 2 a bit off. I tried a disciple and the unarmed animations are fine. The paladin with a 1h sword was pretty boring and I've seen dreadknights with 2h swords and yeah the animations need work, but if you don't play a game because you don't like the animations you're crazy. "I love this game but the animations suck so I won't play it." WTF??? Clearly these people don't remember the good ol' days of C64 or 286s. You have something called an imagination, use it. |
|
|
1/19/07 6:57:41 PM#28
Everyone has their own opinon/comments; allow me to post mine: 1.) Performance: Wow unless you guys have your settings full blast I have to admit that my system is nothing compared to yours and I've had very very very litlte issues. a.) AMD Athalon XP 2100~1.7Gig; this processor is what? (2-3 years old), Motherboard (2-3yrs old), 1 Gig Mushkin Black RAM (1yr old), GeForce 7800 GS AGP 256mb (less than 6 months old). b.) Anyways the only problems I'm having is studdering, when the game first loads, at Character Creation Screen the music will pause a brief moment, and or crackle (probably due to my processor), when I'm in game and I'm moving around sometimes it freezes up for a min (total) but for the most part I can play the game. I dont have my settings full blast, in fact I'm probably running 1024x768, though I will have to confirm. c.) On this performance thing, isnt it a possiblity that Vanguard was made like that of EverQuest 2 that its built for years to come for upgrades etc. That no rig can fully support what Vanguard has to offer? For instance when EverQuest 2 was released on launch day back in November of 2004, it could already support resolutions past 2000x2000 (or something like that); but not very many monitors out there supported that high. So isnt it a possiblity that those that have new gaming systems/upgrades that if you choose a high setting you'll still lag because perhaps that neither can fully support all that Vanguard has to offer? (this is just a theory) 2.) Someone mentioned that Vanguard is the only title to be released this year that is well overdue; allow me to mention "Lord of the Rings Online: Shadows of Angmar". I beta tested that game and am anticipating it too. 3.) I think the main reason I'm getting Vanguard is the fact that its already inlcuded into the Station Access Pass, I already play EverQuest 1 and 2, and or SWG so adding Vanguard doesnt up my price any :) 4.) Its probably true to almost any product released that there will be bugs. I bet you that if youre using any Beta version of Vista you're saying to yourself "Dont release it to the public on January 30th 2007, its not ready yet" but either way we look at it, there will be updates available. So you can either choose to wait 6 months and download a couple gigs of patches or upgrade as you go from day to day. This statement isnt to convert you to buy it, I'm just saying it would be easier to me to get updated patches rather than waiting 6 months and buy January 30ths retail version and then download 2-4gigs of patches and wait from 1hr to 10hrs. |
|
|
1/19/07 7:07:42 PM#29
Actally you misread that if your taking about my post (assuming that becuase I didn't notice any other comment like that) I stated that Vanguard is the first title that has been released in a long time thats any good not the 'only title', and yes LOTR looks good, I hope to get access at least to give my 2 copper on it but thats another topic.. Bring on the WARRRRGGHH! |
|
|
1/19/07 7:26:58 PM#30
If one is required to upgrade a system to play this game comfortably, that is a huge shame. I would like to think that one of the many successful things WoW did was have a game that could run on really low end systems. One of the things LOTRO has going for it is this very thing.
It is early, we all know that, i think that we sure have come to expect a really polished game ala. WoW, and why not? as the consumers we have all gotten used to 'early' games and continue to think that is is acceptable, by making excuses for the Dev. and the 'money' behind these games. Another thing LOTRO has going for it i might add :) Its early, yes. but it has become the norm, let those that are okay with this trend pay for the lazy, greedy, Dev. teams, and 'money' company's behind these games, to finish the 'beta' for us. they have been doing it for far too long, and will continue to do it. LOTRO will have my pre-order money, and i dont often pre-order anything. |
|
|
Poldano
Novice Member
Joined: 12/22/06
Those who stand on the shoulders of giants should not complain about the view. |
1/19/07 8:18:00 PM#31
I experience bugs last night that I had not experienced before. My newly-rolled character was respawning far from the nearest altar, and actually quite far from any altar. Older bugs do not seem to be going away. The frequency of combat encounters where the mob I was fighting disappeared increased. I was actually told "cannot see opponent" in the middle of an effing open field, and it was effing killing me! The frequency of encounters where the mob's actual remaining life was not reflected in its displayed life also has not seemed to me to have decreased, in spite of published bug fix reports saying the problem has diminished. You've heard tell of the character graphics, and the stories are true. I like the game, but it is being pushed out the door too soon. There has been a surprising amount of improvement since start of Beta 5, but there is still a substantial amount of improvement needed.
|
|
1/19/07 10:55:00 PM#32
Vanguard would have been a good game if SOE never had their hands on it. Since SOE is the distributor, Vanguard will be released too soon, never fix key bugs, and milk players money for a product that will never feel finished. I was sickened by thier shoveling out the expansions and adventure packs that had to be purchased instead of adressing the issues players cared about. I will never play another SOE game again. |
|
|
1/19/07 11:01:04 PM#33
Vanguard died for me. It's probably the only game next to SWG that I played for a single week that I quit. Not because of difficulty, but strictly because McDonald - er McQuacker - errr damn it : MCQUAID tried to use a formula that WoW already perfected and then some. Am I a WoW fanboy? No. I do play though, and I do like it. I play all games anyway...but Vanguard? No thank you.
Gameplay > GRAFFIXZ0mgWIND!!?!@?@3?! |
|
|
1/19/07 11:53:23 PM#34
Originally posted by gpettGotta love the 2 post wonders that come here to post their SOE hate. SOE has nothing to do with the VG problems. In fact, if SOE didn't come along there is a very good chance VG would never have seen the light of day due to a lack of funding. |
|
|
1/20/07 12:21:15 AM#35
Originally posted by JustFinch hmm 'WoW perfected formula'? Hmm.. Vanguard isn't a watered down mix of well.. everything, cuz thats WoW in a nutshell, in fact it's the complete reverse, cafting and diplomicy are far more complex then WoW's 'push one button n' go' systems' and the combat requires a tad more thinking then button spammage, although the combat system is well kinda standard for any MMO. Anyone thats played a week in Vanguard (even if they havn't reached lvl 10 yet), will tell you there is a lot more to offer in it then WoW had when it started and it's far more deep then what you are making out it to be. So how one question how is Vanguard using the supposed 'WoW formula' again? Are you a WoW fanboi? Quite Possibily.. Are you prejugding a game you probly havn't played properly or even at all, purly on the basis the UI looks 'WoW-est'? Most Deffinatly. You my friend have jumped on board the flaming wagon as it's currently 'cool' to flame Vanguard, and you come out with sorry the most crazyest statment of all 'Vanguard copied WoW and I've played Vanguard so it's true' the players who claimed that VG was 'WoW-est' at least admitted they hadn't played the game yet. Word to the wise, not every game out there will attempt to 'clone' WoW Vanguard's one of those games, so by doing the 'it's WoW!' excuse is very invaild here. The 'problem' with Vanguard is techical not the gameplay, you could at least read peoples problems with the game first to see why they aren't intending on getting it before you tried the 'WoW clone' card. NB: This topic was ment to correct not flame a clealy false statement about Vanguard, in the real world we call that slander. Bring on the WARRRRGGHH! |
|
|
1/20/07 6:51:45 AM#36
from todays patch notes:
- Paladin, Warrior, Dread Knight, Ranger, Cleric, Sorcerer, Shaman - New particles and animations have been added |
|
|
1/20/07 8:35:30 AM#37
I don't know. I've been trying Vanguard in beta and the lag and sound looping effects are so bad that it's annoying to even run. I got to the point where I had to turn the audio off. Every patch I try to log in and see how it goes, but so far... not well.
Maybe there is a good story hidden there somewhere, and maybe the wide open exploration thing'll be fun enough to ignore the huge amounts of lag and crappy sound. I'm actually pretty bummed about it, I thought and hoped it would be a lot more playable. binarypc |
|
|
1/20/07 10:56:48 AM#38
Originally posted by Mordith What does the number of posts have to do with anything? gpett makes a good point about Sony's business practices. When I quit FFXI they continued to charge my credit card for months and every month I would go and quit all over again it took 3 months to finally straighten it out but I did not get a refund. I may have been able to if I had called my bank right away.
|
|
|
1/20/07 11:03:12 AM#39
To complain about performance issues of ANY game while it is in BETA is ignorant at best. BETA is not a finished product, nor is it intended to be. BETA also is ran on lower end servers than the game would be running on at release (insert lag here). Also, those complaining about graphical issues that gave up playing after a week, I suggest you try again after the latest patch. There is (wait for it) improvement.
Try this, next time your mother, or wife, or whoever is baking a cake, tell her how much is sucks before its done cooking. ignorance is bliss |
|
|
1/20/07 12:37:15 PM#40
Originally posted by gpett Don't look surpised if in 1-2 years SoE buys Vanguard from Brad if the game isnt growing fast enough. |
|