Trending Games | The Crew | Elder Scrolls Online | Landmark | Neverwinter

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,848,378 Users Online:0
Games:732  Posts:6,222,839

Show Blog

Link to this blogs RSS feed

Camelot Unchained Revealed

Follow my journey in Camelot Unchained.

Author: gylnne

Ex-Mythic Head Explains Why Camelot Unchained Isn't the Spiritual Successor to DAoC

Posted by gylnne Monday April 8 2013 at 3:02PM
Login or Register to rate this blog post!

Mark gave warcry an interview today. Here are some things he had to say.

 

Mark Jacobs talks about Kickstarting his realm vs. realm project that still kind of sounds like DAoC.

Mythic Entertainment - cofounded by Mark Jacobs in 1996 - was among those companies leading the charge for online games in the genre's infancy. Dark Age of Camelot used the stories of King Arthur as a backdrop for massive realm versus realm combat in 2001. Now that the bubble of World of Warcraft-aping games has subsided, Jacobs wants to go back to his roots by Kickstarting a new game he jokingly gave a working title in reference to his old game - Camelot Unchained. He's asking for $2 million, while also putting up $2 million of his money, to bring MMOs back to the "old school" player vs. player sweet spot he loves so much.

"Camelot Unchained is a TriRealm, RvR-focused, MMORPG composed of a mixture of old-school MMORPG elements with some sandbox-like elements and no PvE-based leveling or loot drops," Jacobs told me in an email exchange. "It is based on the premise that MMORPGs can also be fun without gear grinding, PvE-raiding and hyper-fast leveling."

You may not be familiar with the term Realm Vs. Realm or RvR, perhaps because it is a registered trademark of Electronics Arts after they acquired Mythic Entertainment in 2006, and it's largely been unused since then. Jacobs skirts that issue by calling his concept for always-on PvP "TriRealm". No matter what you call it, RvR means locking the players in an endless structure of conflict based on location or racial divides. How will Camelot Unchained be different?

"It's about giving the players the tools they need to make their own choices, then sitting back and watching them have fun," Jacobs said before pointing out a shortcoming in the DAoC system. "It means players who are fighting against each other night after night in an open world where they are not 'keep trading' for fun and profit, but rather trying to decide whether it's better to burn down the structures they capture or to try to build it up and defend them."

Due to Jacobs' former position, Camelot Unchained's goals and the working title, it's easy to point to this new MMO as a sequel or extension of Dark Age of Camelot. He assures me that's not the case. "Frankly, if I wanted to raise more money with our Kickstarter, it might have been better to say the game is a spiritual successor, to promise PvE, and to do the whole 'wink wink' thing at EA," Jacobs said. "Instead, I've done the exact opposite because I think that it's important for people not to regard this game as Dark Age of Camelot 2.0, but rather as one with its own unique world and backstory.

"This game isn't a spiritual successor to Dark Age of Camelot or a sequel/prequel. on the other hand, we are using some of the same public domain legends/tales that I choose to use for Dark Age of Camelot, but this time, with a rather massive twist."

Read more here: Ex-Mythic Head Explains Why Camelot Unchained Isn't the Spiritual Successor to DAoC

Mkilbride writes: Great blog. I really like all this helpful information. Mon Apr 08 2013 3:20PM Report
gylnne writes: Appreciate the comment, thank you. Mon Apr 08 2013 5:43PM Report
chilltime99 writes: good read. Mon Apr 08 2013 8:26PM Report
gylnne writes: Thanks for taking the time to read chill. Wed Apr 10 2013 10:02AM Report

MMORPG.com writes:
Login or Register to post a comment