Trending Games | World of Warcraft | EVE Online | ArcheAge | Star Wars: The Old Republic

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,815,071 Users Online:0
Games:731  Posts:6,214,008

Show Blog

Link to this blogs RSS feed

Spouse Aggro!

I blog at www.spouseaggro.com, write for www.ablegamers.com, run www.mmovoices.ning.com and post all over the net. HOWDY!

Author: beauturkey

A bit of news for Spellborn lovers!

Posted by beauturkey Tuesday January 26 2010 at 2:10AM
Login or Register to rate this blog post!

A pretty small tid-bit, but it is something. This is from the official forums:

Hello Players,

Here is an update regarding Spellborn from our CEO.

The rumors are true! Spellborn Version Two is on the way. The developer has released the new version in Japan, and based on the success of that launch and the fine tuning of the game, we will keep you informed as to when we shall launch the English version of the game. When we do, we will be inviting registered players of the old version, who have valid email addresses on file, to become our beta players. In the meantime, why not check out some of our other great free games at www.acclaim.com? Hope to see you ingame! -- Howard Marks, CEO of Acclaim Games, Inc.

Thanks,
Acclaim Staff


I believe that the Japanese version is the same as the one we can play now, save for the addition of a cash shop. One player noted that from what he could tell, the cash shop items were pretty run-of-the-mill stuff. There were, however, certain armors for sale that were in the Japanese version that actually gave some stats. This has not been confirmed and frankly I don't care if they sold a card of God-Mode. I just want the game to go on, to be updated and to be alive.

Spellborn was one of those games that I literally dreamed of, falling in love with it's art-style and atmosphere. When it started to have issues I wondered if it would be able to survive. While it has been completely free in it's current condition, it does need some help. Looks like we might get it!

It;s just so odd to see such a great game falter in the way that I did, and I wonder why it did. Some think it was because the game was too linear, and others think that the simplicity of the quests did it in. In all truth I think it was the fact that the game was a little too unique for it's own good. There is also something to the theory that most players don't like the choice to look how they want, and would rather look silly in armor that is known to be powerful rather than to look how they want because armor stats meant nothing.

Oh well, we'll see. I certainly don't want the hard work of the original developer team to disappear. Maybe finding the right payment model (cash shop based) will be just what the game needs. I am a huge fan of the cash shop, so this is good news to me. I am also a fan of sticking it to players that somehow think that cash shop items should not have some effect on the game world or on combat. The cries of "real life financial advantage" have been bogus since subscriptions were ever included in the list of things that are needed to play. If selling gear in the cash shop scares off those type of forum whiners, good by me.

I just wish the game didn't have to go through all this before it got to this point.

Beau

dodgetigger writes:

Also people that complain that item shops give the people with more money an advantage forget that subscription based models give people with too much time the advantage.

Tue Jan 26 2010 2:34AM Report
Skuz writes:

The biggest problem that Spellborn had was poor performance & terrible PvP balance.

If those haven't changed the game will still flop, it will gain based on being F2P but the crowds joining to take a look will only create even worse performance than before if they do not address the causes of those issues.

PvP balance can be addressed once the game starts making money, but the lag if not addressed before relaunch will kill the fun stone dead.

Tue Jan 26 2010 7:56AM Report
beauturkey writes:

 I think you are presuming that most players play either on the PvP server or participate in PvP. This is not true, being that even a pvp'er must play mostly pve in order to level.

 I am not saying that it is not one of the games issues, just that you might be giving that issue too much credit. Like I said with EVE, the game could be played and enjoyed just fine without the PvP.

 Performance? Some. ON my two decent PC's it runs just fine. But I could see some issues with older machines.

 

 

Tue Jan 26 2010 10:37AM Report

MMORPG.com writes:
Login or Register to post a comment