Trending Games | Elder Scrolls Online | Mu Legend | Revelation | Shards

    Facebook Twitter YouTube YouTube.Gaming
Username:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:3,450,893 Users Online:0

Show Blog

Link to this blogs RSS feed

Vicarious Existence

To blog about what is going on in the MMO genre from a casual MMO player's viewpoint.

Author: UnSub

If You Want Laughs, Do Stand-Up: Gimmick Dev Accounts Have Got To Go

Posted by UnSub Saturday September 6 2008 at 8:31AM
Login or Register to rate this blog post!

It probably isn't a new thing in terms of MMO community management, but I've seen a number of gimmick developer accounts pop up in games that otherwise want to be taken seriously. By 'gimmick dev accounts' I mean devs who create a personality and stay 'in-character' when they post in forums. (For the most part they appear to be forum moderator accounts, but there may be exceptions so I'll push the definition out to include all devs.)

I don't follow every MMO so can't comment on every single one of these, but the ones I'm aware of are:

  • SuperModerator of City of Heroes / City of Villains. He was created to be have a more 'golden age' personality (i.e. more formal speech, uses words like 'swell', saves kittens from trees, that sort of thing) and didn't appear in the Community Digest so that threads he posted in didn't draw extra attention from players. It looks like this account has been informally retired, perhaps since a few new mods have started to managed the CoH/V boards.
  • Son of Landshark and Captain Pouches of Fallen Earth. Captain Pouches started out as an FE joke - a wombat assassin dev, or something - but has since become a formal account of someone within FE LLC / Icarus Studios. Son of Landshark premiered in this thread, which left even long-term FE community members (who found Captain Pouches funny as an in-joke) with a solid case of the WTFs.
  • Foxbat of Champions Online. Foxbat is a "humourous" character within the Chamions Universe - think Batman if Bruce Wayne had no tragedy in his life, was a selfish git raised on comics and was into world domination - and this account uses that personality style in their posts. Weapon of preference is a super powered ping pong ball gun.

It might just be me, I admit, but I don't find any of the above funny. I really think having someone in position of authority pretending to be a clown doesn't make them appear friendlier, it just makes them look like a clown. I'm all for more dev intereaction with the community, but hiding behind a joke account isn't the way to go. At best it is a weak joke that can wear out its welcome and / or confuse people; at worst it is outright insulting to the player community that the dev doesn't even bother posting as who they are.

If a dev wants to be funny, they need to do it under their own name or a consistent non-gimmick account. If they fall flat on their face, so be it, but that's the risk you take in trying to be funny - hiding behind a gimmick account isn't clever, but is insulting. Heck, if JLove, lead costume designer for CoH/V can post stuff like this under his own name, there really isn't a reason for gimmick dev accounts at all:

Player: "I am definitely buying the Pack to support the game. One of the reasons we were able to get the VEATs in I12 was due to the sales of the Wedding Packs. If buying cyborg packs will allow more resources to be put into the release of I13."

JLove: "What are you talking about? We all bought solid gold football helmets hand crafted by the moon pope and hired a bunch of Welsh Oxford educated super models to have a kobe steak fight. We lost 3 weeks worth of work time because of the E coli outbreak. It was worth every dirty penny. Now we're all jones'in for another round, so please help us chase the dragon. Daddy needs another hit."

Player: "Does it have leg armor?"

JLove: "No, Yes, Maybe, I don't know. I haven't even seen anything yet. Beep Beep Beep, what that sound? It's the sound of a truck load of your rent money going into my already to fat pockets. No, ready ask the team of Guatemalan children that I now outsource to because of the massive boat loads of money I now make from the micro packs."

Dreathor writes:

Lighten up.

Sat Sep 06 2008 9:10AM Report
toootoo writes:

lighten up

Sat Sep 06 2008 2:34PM Report
InvisibleLf writes:

Lighten up.

Sat Sep 06 2008 3:29PM Report
pegleg writes:

lighten up.

Sat Sep 06 2008 10:12PM Report
Gajari writes:

Lighten up.

Sun Sep 07 2008 12:14AM Report
caemsg writes:

Lighten up.

Sun Sep 07 2008 1:15AM Report
adapt writes:

Lighten up.

Sun Sep 07 2008 4:19AM Report
orodeon writes:

Lighten up..

Sun Sep 07 2008 5:37AM Report
kingbloop writes:

Get a sense of humor?

Sun Sep 07 2008 5:41AM Report
bartoni33 writes:

Lighten up... and get a sense of humor?

Mon Sep 08 2008 12:47AM Report
PrinnySquad writes:

Lighten up, Rambo.    (Just kiddin'!)

Mon Sep 08 2008 1:23AM Report
Borme22 writes:

 I agree..?



Mon Sep 08 2008 5:40AM Report
Curate writes:

Lighte-- oh, I can't, I just can't. I even agree, in a fashion.

I don't have a problem with a developer taking on a handle, such as Foxbat or even the decidedly non-wacky Dr. Destroyer. I think it adds a bit of flavor to the proceedings. I don't even have a problem with such handles posting "in character" as long as it's an announcement of some kind. Is there a contest coming up? Foxbat can announce it using puns and self-aggrandizing statements, while Dr. Destroyer can announce using threats, taunts and... well, self-aggrandizing statements.

However: if a dev is going to sit down and converse with the player base, I'd rather they ditch the shtick and just talk. You can still be funny, of course, and little in-character digs are fine, but a prolonged discussion about server stability or quest design with a Foxbat who insists on yukking it up would get real tiring real fast. This has everything to do with tone and nothing to do with taking on a persona. I find SexyJay's quoted replies more asinine than amusing, for instance. In-character or not, he comes across as smugly dismissive.

To your examples:

Supermoderator – I don't remember much about that account, but if the posts were in-character explanations of why a thread was locked or an admonition to stay polite/on-topic, I don't see a problem. It'd help lighten the mood.

Son Of Landshark – On the other hand, this is simply spam. Hard to judge without browsing the forums for a while, of course, but this looks like someone posting because of the four Mai Tais at lunch rather than for any real purpose. I'd have the same reaction if it was Colin_Dwan posting about how much he rules at minigolf. I'd rather my devs start threads that have some point, cutesy handle or not. Given that the game's not even released yet, though, I'd engage in slack-cutting.

Foxbat – Wellll... the character is just flat-out goofy. I get the fanservice angle here, since he's been part of the franchise since, what, 1982 or thereabouts, but it's a lame character that should've stayed in the books. I don't blame you for not finding him funny. However, a quick search of the account's posts led me to this thread, which is a prime example of when to speak plainly (Razor's reply) and when to utilize the smackhand while smiling about it (Foxbat's in-character lockdown):

Mon Sep 08 2008 11:45AM Report writes:
Login or Register to post a comment