Trending Games | Landmark | Warhammer 40K: Eternal Crusade | Star Citizen | Guild Wars 2

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,920,293 Users Online:0
Games:760  Posts:6,311,240

Show Blog

Link to this blogs RSS feed

The Roleplayer's Redoubt

Is there a really place for roleplaying in MMOs? What do roleplayers bring to the table? How can developers foster stronger roleplaying communities? How do traditional concepts fit into the realities of contemporary online roleplaying?

Author: OddjobXL

Strange New World: A SWG Vet Contemplates STO

Posted by OddjobXL Monday March 9 2009 at 9:50AM
Login or Register to rate this blog post!

My SWG experience was probably an atypical one.  I started off in beta with a slew of not only players but player associations hell bent on starting a player city.  Those were happy times.   Two things SWG got right at the time were wilderness and crafting.  Roleplaying a colonist-refugee, as were most of us, was an astoundingly good fit at first.  Dangerous creatures with believable AI, scattered resources of with a slew of assorted traits and all of us helping each other out in a world where there was nothing useful on the bazaar for quite a while.   We bootstrapped.  We barnraised.  We ultimately did it.  They still talk about Vagabond's Rest on Starsider.

Eventually, though, what other folks were noticing eventually effected us as well.  There was no Star Wars to be found.  Where was The Empire?  Where were the Jedi (or, alternately, why should Jedi be in the game in the Rebellion Era)?  Where were the space ships?  Where's the adventure?  Why is everyone using pikes and battleaxes and wearing the same armor which we never saw in the movies? 

We really started losing players due to lack of Star Warsiness as many of us were roleplayers, or Star Wars fans, looking for that experience.

In time there were Jedi.  Be careful what you wish for.  Because it was such an arduous grind only powergamers looking for PvP advantage, for the most part, managed to pull it off.   If you see Ben Kenobi on the road kill him.  Or he'll kill you.  And then tea-bag you while pointing out, constructively, your newbness.  No, somehow this doesn't seem like the Jedi I remember from the films.

Space, and starships, strode in proudly with Jump to Lightspeed.  I have to admit I was blown away.  SWG could have done much worse than following a space sim model.  Multiplayer ships in particular had folks cheering.  It was really a dream come true.  Sadly, one does tend to wake up.  There was no real content in space after grinding through the initial set of missions.   PvP-RPers and space simmers on Starsider, using typical roleplayer ingenuity, designed and ran PvP scenarios which were popular and the idea migrated to other servers as well.   But PvE was lacking.   Multiplayer ships were pointless.  They were a weak link in PvP as well.  Worse, there was no cargo, no passngers, no trade lanes and certainly no contraband or Imperial blockades to run.  In space, nobody can hear you yawn.

At that point, though, the damage had been done.  Casual gamers thought SWG was freakish and certainly not about Star Wars.  The Star Wars fan community was in open revolt.  PvPers were running amok and completely dominating the forums with their usual set of complaints ("Make everyone PvP - it's called Star WARS!") and internectine battles about who and what should be nerfed.  Roleplayers, the ones who'd already formed strong communities, weathered this as best they could and created their own alternate realities and improvised systems.   Kosterites, those who did find aspects of the original game design fascinating despite its delinkage from Star Wars, also hung in.   There was, in fact, more than a little overlap with the last two categories.  Crafters, entertainers, politicians, pilots and beastmasters tended to be well represented in the roleplaying community.

But SWG was in trouble because of its failure to convey the setting even before NGE hit.  The NGE hit the Kosterites and the few post-WoW PvPers pretty hard.  We won't dwell on this.  Everyone knows the story.  SWG is slowly recovering, a little at least, but it's not Star Wars.  It's su generis now.  A weird thing with some great features, alot of bad ideas, and an eclectic but loyal player base.

So what to expect from Star Trek Online?

What drew me into to STO was a comment about multiplayer ships in an unrelated thread.  I remembered, I thought, that STO would have them.  As it turns out, well, not so much.   This is a problem but I think Cryptic knows that.  To most Star Trek fans the dream really is crewing a ship, and going on adventures, with their friends just like their vicarious heroes in the series do.  Even people with a casual, passing, familiarity will likely assume this is what to expect.

It's to Star Trek what the Empire and The Jedi should have been to SWG.

Yet, I'm still very excited about STO as a roleplayer and a gamer.  

One of my constant refrains in the SWG forums was that terminal missions needed to be both randomized and more in depth in structure and content.  My examples at the time were a solitaire card game (now a PC game) called Hornet Leader and the classic X-Com.   If these relatively simple variations in structure can hold players interest why can't MMOs use the same techniques to generate nonrepetative adventures?   Well, maybe, we're going to see that for perhaps the first time in STO.

There's also talk about noncombat elements in mission resolution.  Science and diplomacy will have roles to play.  How will this work?  I don't know.  But I really, really, want to see what they come up with.  Let's face it, MMOs are mainly structured on never ending, pointless, violence because that's relatively easy to do.  I think it's time for us, as players, to move out of the cromagnon stage of thumping each other, and every baby seal in sight, with clubs.  Well, y'know, at least a little bit.  No violence at all and we end up with Sims Online and nobody wants that.  Literally.

I think it's possible to both want player crews and be excited about NPC crews too.  Why?  Because I am.  I'm a pet guy.  I loved my CoV Mastermind on Virtue.  My crusty old freighter captain in SWG is a hardcore beastmaster (as my friends know too well "Grim's obsessing on the petgrind again?!").   Having a crew of NPCs, assuming they're created as in depth and persistent entities with customization in both appearance and skill sets, will be just too much fun.   I don't even have a rational explanation for it.  I just like it.

Lastly, while I'm no Trekkie or Trekker, I do loves me a good setting.  Remember the deeper the setting the deeper the roleplay.  I think the community here, as long as the purists remember newbies are people too, will be fantastic for roleplayers.  Being a Federation officer means something that no other game really conveys.  There's a sense of unity, family, decency, curiousity, open-mindedness and justice that's kinda lacking elsewhere.  To the extent that ethos can carry over to the players as well we might have something unique on our hands as roleplayers and as MMO players.

Or, there will be an XBOX invasion and we roleplayers will be begging for multiplayer ships just so we can have an island of sanity in the madness.

Ah, but, no.  Must be openminded and decent and remember console gamers are people too.  It's the Star Fleet way!

spdkilla writes:

LOL console gammers are so NOT people .......   J/K   :P

:)   

Anyway I understand the whole we want player crews but people need to give it a rest.  From what I have read player crews were not a real consideration in the initial planning by Cryptic for STO.(my evidence for this was a youtube video of their STO announcement i think thats what it was )  It would at this point require them to if not start over at least delay release for months possibly years to implement it seamlessly and relatively bug free. along with safeguards for dc'ing , lagging, and npc switching , scaling, and upgrading systems.

I have seen many people say well just push it back 2 years or so .... LOL !! Sorry folks they have a set budget to stick to and i am sure they have a time frame they have given not just investors but creditors. To make it simple they have until XX-XX-20XX to make a profit. They aren't going to push past that date to launch regardless of what happens if they can help it.

They have already done a game where after development was started it was scrapped and the direction and core elements were changed and that game failed (Tabula Rasa anyone). I doubt they want to do that again.  I heard it cost over 80mill to make TR because of that change.

I think they will follow CoX in that regard make a stable solid core and build on it with updates, expansions and new features and yes this means ship interiors are most likely going to happen as was stated.

Knowing cryptic i wouldn't even rule out some features that may even surprise us down the road. If they could do CoH + CoV maybe they can add new races (such as borg/speices 8472 etc). even if it starts out as a stand alone game. Give them a chance then frag their boards to hell if they fail most of their customers.  Maybe even start an STO Vet Refuge Forum......

To the author of the blog not all of my comments are directed at you pick and choose wisely  :) ... some are for the posts soon to follow.... :-P

I 100% agree with everything in the paragraph that starts with:

Lastly, while I'm no Trekkie or Trekker, I do loves me a good setting......

Mon Mar 09 2009 12:25PM Report
spdkilla writes:

To the blogger thats not the only think i agree with there is a lot of other stuff as well but i chose that because it sums up my feelings and probably more than a few others on STO.  IMO Very well said...

Mon Mar 09 2009 12:31PM Report
spdkilla writes:

LoL my bad that was NCsoft NOT cryptic with TR please disregard that I should proof read BEFORE I hit save... But anyway the point is i doubt Cryptic wants to make the same mistake.

Mon Mar 09 2009 12:38PM Report
spdkilla writes:

Yeah, Yeah NCsoft/Destination Games

Bah.... I am done

 

/carry on

Mon Mar 09 2009 12:45PM Report

MMORPG.com writes:
Login or Register to post a comment